Join our mailing list for Real Estate News, Events, Insights & Resources.

Major scandals often leave scars across multiple sectors. Odebrecht deeply affected government institutions, Lojas Americanas shook the retail sector, and now Banco Master has added a negative chapter to the history of Brazil’s financial market. Yet the impact of such crises extends beyond the industries involved, also shaping public perception and the urban landscape.
Repeated protests marked the entrance of Auri Plaza Faria Lima, a building that today is popularly known as the “Master Building,” referring to the headquarters of Master Bank. Driving along Rua Fiandeiras today, passersby see the imposing tower surrounded by barricades and an empty space where the company’s logo once stood.
According to the market intelligence team at SiiLA, Master Bank’s presence in the building is nearing its end, with the company’s exit scheduled for April.
According to Felipe Laragnoit Leite, founding partner at Primaz&Co, despite the negative publicity currently surrounding the property, the reputational impact on the asset itself is unlikely to last long.
“I don’t believe a tenant necessarily creates long-term problems in that sense. The practical issues fall on the owner, such as the contract or the furniture — these are operational matters. The image might be affected, but only for a very short period. From a tenant perspective, it doesn’t really affect the building. However, if Master were the owner, then the situation would be different,” he explains.
Currently, the financial institution pays around R$3.9 million per month to occupy the building’s 17,900 square meters. Given the size of the property and the fact that it is a single-tenant building, the asset had been a gold mine for its owners — though one with significant exposure.
Leite notes that pursuing a single-tenant strategy may not be the best option at the moment. While it carries risks, securing a new tenant under such a model could still be positive for the owners.
“When we talk about 4,000 square meters, that’s one thing. But large properties like Auri Plaza are somewhat riskier. In situations like this, the owner bears the cost of the vacant asset. If the property is leased within a year, that’s great. But if it takes longer to find a new occupant, the best option may be to shift to a multi-tenant format,” he says.
Within this same universe of properties that became vacant due to controversies, Bothanic Faria Lima Corporate is another single-tenant asset that had been leased by Reag. Unlike Auri Plaza, however, the building is a boutique office property with just 5,000 square meters.
The asset became vacant following controversies linked to Operação Carbono Neutro, which aimed to dismantle a money laundering scheme. The financial institution was liquidated, leaving the building 100% vacant after less than two years of occupancy. However, market sources say the property is already in talks to receive a new tenant.











Join our mailing list for Real Estate News, Events, Insights & Resources.
