Join our mailing list for Real Estate News, Events, Insights & Resources.

In recent days, it was reported that construction industry leaders met with Finance Minister Fernando Haddad. During the meeting, the minister allegedly stated that the federal government is still considering exempting Real Estate Investment Funds (FIIs) from taxation.
The proposal to tax these funds recently surfaced as part of the tax reform. However, contrary to the expectations of sector leaders, the government did not include a specific exemption for FIIs. If taxation is implemented, the rate will be applied gradually starting in 2027 and will reach its full extent by 2029.
“The government, when publishing Complementary Law No. 214/21, vetoed the rules that allowed investment funds in general, FIIs, and Fiagros to be excluded from the concept of taxpayers for these taxes,” explains Matheus Bertolo Piconez, a tax partner at Veirano Advogados.
“It is likely that, absent any change or reversal of the vetoes, FIIs will be taxed under IBS (Goods and Services Tax) and CBS (Contribution on Goods and Services) on their real estate activity revenues,” he adds.
Although the income tax exemption for individual shareholders was maintained, taxation on rental revenues could reduce fund profitability.
“The veto will affect operations such as property leasing, which could harm fund profitability,” explains Piconez. “This change alters FII taxation, which was previously exempt at both the fund level and on dividend distributions, provided legal requirements were met,” he highlights.
Piconez points out that Brick-and-Mortar Funds, which derive revenues from leasing and real estate transactions, will be the most affected.
The National Congress has a period of 30 calendar days to deliberate on the veto in a joint session, as stipulated in Article 66, §4 of the Federal Constitution. Overriding the veto requires an absolute majority of votes from deputies and senators, counted separately.
“If the veto stands and is not overturned by Congress, the attractiveness of these funds may decrease, thus losing their appeal as an important vehicle for financing agribusiness and the construction industry,” Lima assesses.The sector reacted strongly to the measure, with the potential taxation sparking significant mobilization in the market. According to Mauro Lima, managing partner at Inter Asset, the initiative demonstrates a misalignment between the government and the productive sector.
“If the veto is upheld and not overturned by Congress, these funds may lose their attractiveness as an important vehicle for financing agribusiness and construction,” says Lima.
Lima also warns that, if the veto stands, the impacts could directly affect the market. “Starting in 2029, taxation would hit the income statement (DRE), harming results to preserve shareholder dividends. Alternatively, these taxes could be passed on to rents, generating inflation. Both options are detrimental to the sector,” he states.
The executive also emphasizes that even the mere announcement of potential taxation has already caused losses in the market. “Regardless of whether the veto is overturned, the sector has lost thousands of shareholders in recent days simply due to the information that these funds might be taxed, harming the value of their shares,” he explains.
For the Ministry of Finance, the reform aims to foster sustainable economic growth, create jobs, reduce social and regional inequalities, and simplify the tax system. In Congress, workgroups aim to finalize discussions as quickly as possible, with the goal of delivering a consolidated text to House Speaker Arthur Lira (PP-AL) before the parliamentary recess.
Read: Brazilian Tax Reform: Potential Impact on Property Taxes, Rent, and Investments











Join our mailing list for Real Estate News, Events, Insights & Resources.
