According to Barbosa, there is no such thing as an investment that is always safe — only varying degrees of risk:

“This idea of ‘always safe’ doesn’t hold up either theoretically or historically. Even savings accounts have been frozen in Brazil. What exists is the notion of more or less risk, depending on the asset, the stage of the cycle, and how it is structured.

In real estate, the market is extremely broad and encompasses very different risk profiles within the sector itself. That’s why the perception of safety must be put into perspective.”

Barbosa explains that, in real estate, safety is more closely linked to the preservation of capital over time, rather than to monthly income predictability or immediate liquidity.

“For institutional investors, the first filter is whether the asset can maintain its real value over the long term. Income predictability can fail temporarily, and liquidity depends on the real estate cycle — but a good property in a strong location tends to preserve and even increase its value over time.”

Another myth surrounding real estate is the belief that any property will appreciate over time, regardless of its characteristics or location.

“The most underestimated risk is the idea that any property will increase in value forever — which simply isn’t true. Good assets, well located and aligned with local demand, tend to appreciate over the long term. Poor assets, badly positioned or out of context, can become obsolete.”

For real estate investment fund (FII) investors, there is yet another often-overlooked risk:

“We see people allocating significant amounts of capital into assets they don’t fully understand, expecting fast and consistent short-term returns — which doesn’t align with real estate dynamics.”

This belief stems from the tangible backing of property — real estate occupies physical space, fulfills a concrete need, and sits on land.

“That creates a clear sense of intrinsic value, which is easier to understand and measure than purely financial assets. But physical backing does not eliminate risk — it only makes risk more tangible.”

That said, there are factors that help mitigate risk in commercial real estate investments:

“The first pillar is location. Location is immutable. A poor asset in a good location can be improved. A great asset in a bad location is doomed.

The second pillar is asset quality. Quality can be enhanced, but that requires capital, time, and proper execution. And there is no guarantee that a retrofit will automatically turn a Class A asset into an A+ property with immediate occupancy.”

For an asset to be considered a safe investment, it depends on several factors — including location, management, asset quality, the current interest rate cycle, and many others.

“Real estate can be resilient, predictable in certain contexts, and effective in preserving capital — but it depends on the asset and its environment.

Safety in real estate is not a permanent state; it is a condition that must be constantly reassessed.”